iPhone 15 Pro Max vs. Pixel 8 Pro camera face-off: the winner may shock you

there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence.

The case was brought by a shareholder because Teslas board did not give them the opportunity to make informed decisions.who held some of the most influential corporate positions (CEO.

to the point where the court found it unclear whether he was acting for Musk or for Tesla.Musk posted shortly after the judgement was handed down.it was Musk himself who proposed the size and structure of his compensation.

they had actually been misinformed about key factors in the decision making process.violating their legal obligation to its shareholders.

dictating the terms the committee considered and eventually approved.

At least as to this transactionwhen explaining why he thought the e-commerce giant had been falling behind.

Why it matters: Tsais conversation with Tangen ranged in topics from Alibabas internal reckoning and competitiveness in artificial intelligence.but that the downturn in the real estate and job markets has put a dent in consumers confidence and willingness to spend.

and that the company is buying back stock at a rapid pace to bolster market value.Tsai said he believed the ability to spend among Chinese is there.